<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you invest more in people or gear?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barefeetstudios.com/2008/04/22/do-you-invest-more-in-people-or-gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barefeetstudios.com/2008/04/22/do-you-invest-more-in-people-or-gear/</link>
	<description>Internet Literacy for Business: Blogging, Podcasting, Online Video &#38; Social Media Howto, Consulting, Training &#38; Public Speaking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:16:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roxanne Darling</title>
		<link>http://www.barefeetstudios.com/2008/04/22/do-you-invest-more-in-people-or-gear/comment-page-1/#comment-2674</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxanne Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barefeetstudios.com/?p=260#comment-2674</guid>
		<description>@Jackie - I like consensus too on this point, though I do know someone out there could make a case for the equipment, otherwise it wouldn&#039;t be such an entrenched practice. My best guess is that it is easier to measure gear and not so easy to measure performance, as that can be highly subjective.

Do you sound how?  I found your message articulate (it&#039;s why you made the cut) and the audio quality overall is certainly lacking, as I was using the small hand-held Xacti instead of a big recording rig. I like being able to whip something out of my purse when the conversation is happening in real time, and hope my interviewees can forgive the ambient noises and less than perfect pitch. :-)  being a new media guru yourself, I suspect you can understand all this and your question was in jest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jackie &#8211; I like consensus too on this point, though I do know someone out there could make a case for the equipment, otherwise it wouldn&#8217;t be such an entrenched practice. My best guess is that it is easier to measure gear and not so easy to measure performance, as that can be highly subjective.</p>
<p>Do you sound how?  I found your message articulate (it&#8217;s why you made the cut) and the audio quality overall is certainly lacking, as I was using the small hand-held Xacti instead of a big recording rig. I like being able to whip something out of my purse when the conversation is happening in real time, and hope my interviewees can forgive the ambient noises and less than perfect pitch. :-)  being a new media guru yourself, I suspect you can understand all this and your question was in jest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.barefeetstudios.com/2008/04/22/do-you-invest-more-in-people-or-gear/comment-page-1/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barefeetstudios.com/?p=260#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>Hey Roxanne, thanks for the interview, I&#039;m glad there was a consensus, I think it&#039;s a shame that human innovation and creativity is so undervalued, monetarily anyhow, in the digital community. 

(Do I really sound like that?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Roxanne, thanks for the interview, I&#8217;m glad there was a consensus, I think it&#8217;s a shame that human innovation and creativity is so undervalued, monetarily anyhow, in the digital community. </p>
<p>(Do I really sound like that?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

