Home > Activism, Money Matters > Paid Bloggers Still Get Google Downgrades

Paid Bloggers Still Get Google Downgrades

by Roxanne Darling on May 19, 2009

I read today in Business Week that Google is getting increasingly sophisticated about tracking blog content that is somehow linked to compensation, alongside a discussion of pending rules from the Federal Trade Commission to cover paid product/service reviews in blog posts. 

A couple of years ago this really hit the fan with one of the first “official” PayPerPost blogging services launched. Bloggers who had earned a decent or better Page Rank saw their status tank to zero once Google realized they were being being paid for certain posts by advertisers.

To its credit, Google also penalized its own Japan division who used the pay per post tactic in an attempt to compete against Yahoo.

Bloggers who are compensated can use the “nofollow” tag within their outbound links to keep those links from being tagged by Google as paid content. I wonder how many bloggers and paying advertisers address this detail specified in their contracts? I love the convenience of logging in to my blog and finding links bout us – so I can go and thank them! The nofollow may well make that harder, but then again, if you are under contract I think it’s the buyer’s responsibility to track the postings of the paid blogger.

With perfect timing, the Social Media Club Question of the Week  (#SMCQ10) has been about “Free Content.” This goes hand-in-hand with the problem of paying people to talk about you. 

The early citizens of the internet have been providing free content of varying value (some of incredible value to be sure) without compensation. “Bloggers” and “Coders” are actually penalized the more popular they become, as they still have to pay for the web servers who connect all those readers/listeners/viewers to their content. Web users have become increasingly more savvy to advertising, and banner ads rarely compensate for the costs much less the value on certain blogs.

I think we are at one of those very klunky places in the transition from an old system, an old ethic, an old set of practices (largely defined by what was mechanically possible) and all new ones. In any transition there are going to be those who hang on to the old, as old is somehow always better in their minds. And of course there are the early adopters who favor the new just as strongly. 

This is further complicated by all of the psycho-emotional issues around “value” and around “what does it cost me.” It’s well established that people do not make rational or logical decisions when in purchase mode. I have a hard time with that as I personally do not like a lot of the gamesmanship that makes up so much of the sales process. I love the social web as it celebrates truth and transparency, as compared to truthiness and manipulative tactics. I am also very supportive of people doing what works for them – the crowds be damned. That means of course if you are someone who likes to kink things, you have the right to do that.

As awkward as things are right now, I think we are moving toward a marketplace where buyers and sellers have more even footing and therefore more responsibility and options. Readers can vet the bloggers to find out if they are paid or not for their reviews – though it should be much easier IMO. There are bloggers who think they are so independent, that they are not influenced. But hello, the very fact someone gave you something, is what started this discussion, now isn’t it? That’s worth sharing too – it only enhances your independent reputation for people like me.

I would prefer that companies who want to get in front of a blogger’s hard-earned audience, consider a more neutral and background NPR-style of true support, ongoing support, rather than a short term “we’ll wine and dine you to talk nice about us then c ya later.” That is largely self-serving (which I know, is not a bad thing per se) but it does not promote the long term sustainability of that high quality blogger. We all benefit from the independent blogger being able to keep telling it like it is – serving up not just the truth but the wide range of stories and connections and insights to her/his readers.

If the truth is getting harder to hide (because so many are recording and tracking so much) then surely truth as a strategy is becoming more efficient, if not yet more appealing.

Aloha,
roxanne-sig

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • Evernote
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Google Reader
  • Share/Bookmark
Thanks for reading! Now is a good time to sign up to receive new articles by email as soon as they are published or subscribe to our RSS feed.

23 Other Comments

{ 5 trackbacks }

Mahalo Mr. Solis | Bare Feet Studios
May 27, 2009 at 9:21 am
Hawaii Officially Dips Toes in the Waters of Social Media | Bare Feet Studios
June 7, 2009 at 8:14 pm
Are blogger fam trips a good idea or are they Jurassic PR? « Sheila Guides You to the Good Stuff
June 9, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Ethics in Social Media: A Glossary | Bare Feet Studios
July 8, 2009 at 8:10 am
Are blogger fam trips a good idea or are they Jurassic PR? « Sheila's Guide To The Good Stuff
July 13, 2009 at 3:21 pm

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Roxanne Darling July 13, 2009 at 12:46 pm

Just to show where this is going, here is an article from the NY Times. Approval by a Blogger May Please a Sponsor

“But unlike postings in most journalism outlets or independent review sites, most companies can be assured that there will not be a negative review: if she does not like a product, she simply does not post anything about it.”

Carnival of Social Networking Tips : Buzz Networker - Social Networking Tips and News for Your Business, Product or Yourself June 19, 2009 at 6:19 am

[...] Scarborough presents Are blogger fam trips a good idea or are they Jurassic PR? posted at Sheila Guides You to the Good Stuff, saying, “When bloggers are invited on fam [...]

This comment was originally posted on Sheila Guides You to the Good Stuff

Kris Bordessa June 28, 2009 at 5:46 pm

Interesting discussion. As I”m coming in late, much has been covered, but I wanted to share that I’ve also been TOO honest with some of my editors. I visited several spots for a story for a major American company with tickets comped (not an entire fam trip, but many expenses were covered). I was disappointed with one place and told my editor so, and left it out of my story. She chose to ignore my firsthand experience and write a review herself to include in the piece, simply because she felt it should be included. Happily, this piece does not carry my byline.

So, while in that particular case the comps weren’t disclosed, I chose to use my own journalistic integrity and NOT include a destination, only to have that integrity shot down by the higher ups. Sometimes people don’t want to hear the truth, I suppose.

This comment was originally posted on Sheila Guides You to the Good Stuff

Sheila Scarborough July 2, 2009 at 3:57 pm

Yeah, but you can look at yourself in the mirror every day – the only point of reference needed, I think.

This comment was originally posted on Sheila Guides You to the Good Stuff

Leave a Comment

Additional comments powered by BackType

Previous post:

Next post: